Books
24 shown
Highest rated
Community reviews
on The Art of War
Too obvious to be insightful
The book is simple, direct, and easy to understand. Some of its principles are interesting as a historical perspective on strategy and conflict, and its concise style makes it very accessible.
Most of the ideas felt extremely obvious to me. I rarely encountered a principle that made me stop and think, “How did I never think of that?” Instead, much of the book felt like common sense presented as strategic wisdom. Because of that, I found it repetitive and rather boring despite its short length.
The Art of War is an interesting book from a historical perspective, but as a source of strategic insight, it didn’t do much for me. My main problem is how obvious most of its ideas felt. Again and again, I found myself reading principles that seemed like basic common sense rather than genuinely surprising or profound observations. I never really had that moment where I had to put the book down and think, “How did I never realize this before?” I can understand why the book has remained influential and why its ideas may be useful as an introduction to strategic thinking. Its simplicity is probably one of the reasons it has survived for so long. But personally, that simplicity also made it boring. It isn’t necessarily a bad book. I simply expected something considerably deeper from a work with such a legendary reputation. For me, it was more historically interesting than intellectually revealing.